Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

  • 344 N.E.2d 166
  • 369 Mass. 904
  • 1976 Mass. LEXIS 910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that implicit knowledge requirement existed in previous version of G. L. c. 269, § 10 [ a ]
  • noting that it is appropriate to refrain from interpreting provisions of statute that do not apply to defendant’s conduct when reviewing defendant’s constitutional challenge to statute
  • construing language comparable to * that in third provision of G. L. c. 269, § 10 [ m ], as creating mandatory minimum sentence
  • considering States that permit same or similar punishment, even if not mandated
  • \[A] penalty designed solely or primarily to deter may be so excessive in comparison to other punishments for more serious crimes as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment.\
  • legislatively mandated punishments subject only to rational basis review and need not withstand “exacting scrutiny”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Reahdon, Bbaucher, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.