· 8/27/1999
Commonwealth v. Fahy
Citations
- 737 A.2d 214
- 558 Pa. 313
- 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
- holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
- holding that claims challenging the legality of sentence are subject to review within the PCRA, but must first satisfy the PCRA’s time limits
- holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
- holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
- holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.