Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/27/1999

Commonwealth v. Fahy

Citations

737 A.2d 214
558 Pa. 313
1999 Pa. LEXIS 2578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
holding that claims challenging the legality of sentence are subject to review within the PCRA, but must first satisfy the PCRA’s time limits
holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition
holding that where a petitioner fails to satisfy the PCRA time requirements, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Fahy

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.