· 3/16/2000
Commonwealth v. Guthrie
Citations
- 749 A.2d 502
- 2000 Pa. Super. 77
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence would be treated as PCRA Petition
- concluding that motion to correct illegal sentence would be treated as PCRA petition
- noting that PCRA court failed to give notice pursuant to former Rule 1507, now Rule 907, but found the issue waived as it was not raised on appeal
- concluding motion to correct illegal sentence had to be treated as petition filed pursuant to PCRA
- concluding motion to correct illegal sentence had to -5- J-A26037-15 be treated as petition filed pursuant to PCRA
- holding motion to correct illegal sentence was properly construed as PCRA petition, but it was untimely filed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Melvin, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.