Skip to main content
· 3/16/2000

Commonwealth v. Guthrie

Citations

  • 749 A.2d 502
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 77
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence would be treated as PCRA Petition
  • concluding that motion to correct illegal sentence would be treated as PCRA petition
  • noting that PCRA court failed to give notice pursuant to former Rule 1507, now Rule 907, but found the issue waived as it was not raised on appeal
  • concluding motion to correct illegal sentence had to be treated as petition filed pursuant to PCRA
  • concluding motion to correct illegal sentence had to -5- J-A26037-15 be treated as petition filed pursuant to PCRA
  • holding motion to correct illegal sentence was properly construed as PCRA petition, but it was untimely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Melvin, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.