Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/30/1975

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

346 A.2d 746
464 Pa. 292
1975 Pa. LEXIS 1065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

sua sponte remanding for suppression court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law respecting claim that confession was coerced and should have been suppressed; noting that claim was not resolvable as matter of law
sua sponte remanding for suppression court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law respecting claim that confession was coerced and should have been suppressed; noting that claim was not resolvable as matter of law
conclusory statement that there was no coercion used in obtaining confession insufficient
conclusory statement that there was no coercion used in obtaining confession insufficient
where remand for a new suppression hearing was warranted after a period of five years had elapsed between the time that the original suppression hearings were conducted and the time when the court would be called upon to set forth its findings of fact
“[Fjull compliance” with Rule 323(i) is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.