Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

  • 590 S.E.2d 518
  • 267 Va. 226
  • 2004 Va. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “in Virginia, while a probation revocation hearing is a criminal proceeding, it is not a stage of a criminal prosecution”
  • “[T]here is no evidence that Judge Griffith treated [appellant] in a biased or prejudicial manner at the revocation hearing.” (emphasis added)
  • \[T]here is no evidence that Judge Griffith treated [appellant] in a biased or prejudicial manner at the revocation hearing.\ (emphasis added)
  • “[W]hile a revocation hearing is a criminal proceeding, it ‘is not a stage of a criminal prosecution.’” (citation omitted)
  • “In the absence of proof of actual bias, recusal is properly within the discretion of the trial judge.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Donald W. Lemons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.