Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/27/1975
Commonwealth v. Jackson
Citations
- 331 A.2d 189
- 459 Pa. 669
- 1975 Pa. LEXIS 600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the defendant was arrested at least forty minutes after the crime had been committed and the description of the perpetrator applied to fifteen to twenty individuals, including the defendant, all of whom were arrested
- general description not enough to support arrest warrant
- general description not enough to support arrest warrant
- concurring opinion of Pomeroy, J.
- concurring opinion of Pomeroy, J.
- concurring opinion of Pomeroy, J.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Appeal, Eagen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-05· cited 211×
- Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-27· cited 201×
- State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 167×
- People v. LippertIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 167×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-08· cited 133×
- United States v. Leroy FisherSecond Circuit· 1983-03-08· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. FarleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-28· cited 45×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-11-05· cited 43×
- Montes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-08-19· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-23· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. ToroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-14· cited 29×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Benjamin Wright v. Julius T. Cuyler, Superintendent, Graterford State Prison, the CommonwealthThird Circuit· 1977-10-06· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-20· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. HookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-15· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SabbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-24· cited 16×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 263×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 156×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-23· cited 137×
- Commonwealth v. BerriosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 117×
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1965-06-30· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-04-18· cited 107×
- Betrand AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-04-13· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. FoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. HoltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-11· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.