Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/21/1999
Commonwealth v. Jackson
Citations
- 722 A.2d 1030
- 555 Pa. 37
- 1999 Pa. LEXIS 131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “absent evidence to the contrary, a reviewing court must presume that the juvenile court carefully considered the entire record”
- articulating this presumption in the context of an adult certification matter
- “The presumption in this Commonwealth remains that if a court has facts within its possession, it will apply them.”
- courts need not “address, seriatim, the applicability and importance of each factor and fact in reaching its final determination,” as legislature chose to impose no requirement for an express discussion of every consideration
- courts need not “address, seriatim, the applicability and importance of each factor and fact in reaching its final determination,” as legislature chose to impose no requirement for an express discussion of every consideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-09· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. MotoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-26· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. SpottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-05· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-07· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. RuffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-01· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. E.F.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-26· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. GheeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-30· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. SaezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-24· cited 2×
- Com. v. IN RE EFSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-26
- Commonwealth v. Taylor, N., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-19
- Commonwealth v. CopelandLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-03-30
- Commonwealth v. FennerBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-03-02
- In re SchmidtLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-12-02
- In the Int. of: K.T. Apl of: K.T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-21
- In the Int. of: K.T. Apl of: CYFSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-21
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 872×
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-11· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. GreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-10· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-11· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. McGinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-22· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. McKeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-19· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-15· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.