Commonwealth v. Hockenberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding issues “relating to the legality of sentence cannot be waived and are cognizable under the PCRA.”
• holding, “[i]ssues relating to the legality of sentence cannot be waived and are cognizable under the PCRA”
• finding that an untimely motion to modify sentence that challenges the legality of a sentence should be treated as a PCRA Petition
• treating appellant’s motion to modify sentence as PCRA petition relating to legality of sentence
• “Issues relating to the legality of sentence cannot be waived and are cognizable under the PCRA.”
• untimely motion to modify illegal sentence treated as PCRA petition, since issues relating to legality of sentence are cognizable under PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).