Commonwealth v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting automatic right to counsel in collateral appeals applies only to first PCRA petitions
• “If the appointment of counsel is deemed necessary for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing, then the petitioner requires the assistance of counsel throughout the litigation of the issue. Such litigation necessarily includes the appeals process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Stossel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-12· cited 184×
• Commonwealth v. Willis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-23· cited 73×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
• Commonwealth v. Finley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
• Commonwealth v. Kutnyak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-13· cited 114×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-06· cited 95×
• Commonwealth v. Kubis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-19· cited 92×
• Commonwealth v. Evans
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-06· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-04· cited 32×
• Com. v. JOHNSON, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-11-17· cited 1×
• Com. v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-02· cited 1×