Skip to main content

Chambers v. State

Citations

  • 903 S.W.2d 21
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 83
  • 1995 WL 379783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f the evidence can be said to be conflicting, we will not say that there has been an abuse of discretion.”
  • “We have repeatedly held that an objection at trial that does not comport with the complaint on appeal presents nothing for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, Baird, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.