Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/16/1992

Johnson v. State

Citations

853 S.W.2d 527
1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 242
1992 WL 367032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an individual may be found guilty of capital murder based on the law of parties without violating Enmund
holding that appellant must proffer an argument to explain how a state action is unconstitutional
holding that an individual may be found guilty of capital murder based on the law of parties
holding that an individual may be found guilty of capital murder based on the law of parties without violating Enmund and noting that Court of Criminal Appeals has continually held that Section 7.02 applies to capital murder cases
noting that court has continually held that Sections 7.01 and 7.02 are applicable to capital murder cases
holding instruction under Article 38.14 does not apply where state closes its case in chief without calling the accomplice and the accomplice testifies as a defense witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Clinton, Baird, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

175 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.