Skip to main content

Scaggs v. State

Citations

  • 18 S.W.3d 277
  • 2000 WL 545926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that there are situations in which a running objection may be more appropriate than a redundant and disruptive series of objections
  • observing that there are situations in which a running objection may be more appropriate than a redundant and disruptive series of objections
  • observing that there are situations in which a running objection may be more appropriate than a redundant and disruptive series of objections
  • stating that trial court may decide motion for new trial based on sworn pleadings and affidavits admitted in evidence
  • stating that trial court may decide motion for new trial based on sworn pleadings and affidavits admitted in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl, Kidd, Yeakel, Dally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Scaggs v. State

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.