Arrington, Charles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that entirety of charge weighed in favor of egregious harm when “charge did not apprise the jury of the proper unanimity requirement”
• concluding that the factor weighed neither in favor nor against an egregious harm finding when neither party addressed unanimity during argument
• concluding that entirety of charge weighed in favor of egregious harm when “charge did not apprise the jury of the proper unanimity requirement”
• concluding that entirety of charge weighed in favor of egregious harm because “charge did not apprise the jury of the proper unanimity requirement”
• concluding that this factor was neutral where unanimity instruction was omitted from charge but neither party’s closing argument commented on unanimity as to each count
• concluding that defendant was not egregiously harmed by jury-charge error where only factor weighing in favor of harm was first one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).