Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/7/1993

Moreno v. State

Citations

858 S.W.2d 453
1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75
1993 WL 99901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that State exhibited warrant and affidavit to trial court
rulings on relevance should be left largely to trial court, relying on its own observations and experience, and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion
rulings on relevance should be left largely to trial court, relying on its own observations and experience, and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion
holding, in a capital murder case, that even though testimony that defendant had planned to kidnap and murder another person was admissible under rule 404(b), it was inadmissible under rule 403
stating that “the appellate record shows that the affidavit in question was not made a part of the record” and that “[w]ithout the affidavit[,] we are not in a position to review the merits of appellant’s complaints”
holding inchoate thoughts are not excludable under Rule 404(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Campbell, Cisneros, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

268 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.