Scheanette v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party neither has a right to hybrid representation nor a constitutional right to represent himself on direct appeal
• holding that a party neither has a right to hybrid representation nor a constitutional right to represent himself on direct appeal
• concluding that it must presume counsel acted pursuant to reasonable trial strategy because it could only speculate as to why counsel acted or failed to act
• presuming that a reasonable trial strategy supported defense counsel’s actions because the court could only speculate as to why counsel acted or failed to act
• stating that an ineffective assistance claim must A be firmly founded in the record @
• presuming that defense counsel 13 acted pursuant to reasonable trial strategy because court could only speculate as to why counsel acted or failed to act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).