Skip to main content

Wallace v. State

Citations

  • 75 S.W.3d 576
  • 2002 WL 424802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that failing to object to in-court identification waives any complaint on appeal
  • A An objection to the [out-of-court photo] array does not preserve for appellate review any complaint regarding the in-court identification. @
  • allegation that array did not contain anyone matching original description by witnesses has no validity
  • discrepancies between early descriptions of suspect and defendant's actual appearance do not necessarily lead to misidentification when evidence is viewed under totality of circumstances
  • “An objection to the array does not preserve for appellate review any complaint regarding the in- court identification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.