Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/9/1994

Butler v. State

Citations

872 S.W.2d 227
1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 30
1994 WL 68878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an autopsy report is admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule
holding that “appellate arguments must correspond with the objection at trial” and if they do not, then error is not preserved
holding that an objection that a witness was testifying from an autopsy report he did not author was not sufficiently specific to preserve a hearsay complaint for appellate review
concluding that the autopsy report prepared by one medical examiner was admissible as a business record based on the authenticating-witness testimony of a different medical examiner in the same office
explaining that before an instruction under article 38.22, section 7, is required, some evidence must be presented to the jury raising the issue of voluntariness
explaining that before the requested instruction under article 38.22, section 7, is required, some evidence must be presented to the jury raising the issue of voluntariness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Maloney, Clinton, McCormick, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

181 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.