Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 213 S.W.3d 338
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
  • 2007 WL 257615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that legislature clearly expressed intent in statute that organized criminal activity and underlying crime can be punished twice
  • concluding that legislature clearly expressed intent in statute that organized criminal activity and underlying crime can be punished twice
  • holding that counsel = s failure to object to hearsay testimony that allegedly violated the Confrontation Clause could have been reasonable trial strategy
  • holding that counsel’s failure to object to hearsay testimony that allegedly violated the Confrontation Clause could have been reasonable trial strategy
  • holding that counsel’s failure to object to hearsay testimony that allegedly violated the Confrontation Clause could have been reasonable trial strategy
  • recognizing trial counsel’s failure to object to hearsay testimony that allegedly violated the Confrontation Clause could have been grounded in legitimate trial strategy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

340 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Garza v. State

142 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.