Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 815 So. 2d 601
  • 2002 WL 352844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a claim of incompetence can only be raised on direct appeal
  • finding defendant’s public records claim insufficiently pled where claim was raised as a concluso-ry assertion within another, separate issue
  • finding postconviction claims to be insufficiently presented for review where appellant did not assert definitive arguments as to the claims on appeal
  • finding it improper to refer to defendant as a “creature that stalked the night”
  • “[The defendant’s] underlying claim that he was incompetent to stand trial should have been raised on direct appeal and therefore is procedurally barred.”
  • “[T]he prosecutor’s isolated comments were not as egregious or cumulative in scope as in cases where this Court has found fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.