Supreme Court of Florida· 6/27/2013

Jennings v. State

Citations

123 So. 3d 1101
2013 WL 3214442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that counsel’s failure to adequately investigate and impeach a State’s witness “deprived the jury of the ability to make a fully informed decision about [the witness’s] credibility”
explaining that claims of improper argument should be raised on direct appeal and cannot form the basis for postconviction proceedings
\[T]he court must accept the movant's factual allegations as true to the extent that they are not refuted by the record.\
“When reviewing the summary denial of a claim raised in a rule 3.850 motion, the court must accept the movant’s factual allegations as true to the extent that they are not refuted by the record.”
“Generally, a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a rule 3.850 motion unless . . . the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively demonstrate that the movant is entitled to no relief . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.