Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 918 So. 2d 999
  • 2006 WL 140403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal of a habeas corpus petition is the appropriate disposition when the petition seeks to obtain collateral relief regarding claims that could or should have been raised in the direct appeal of the judgment and sentence
  • refusing to remand where the trial court improperly denied a petition, where dismissal was the proper disposition
  • refusing to remand where the trial court improperly denied a petition, where dismissal was the proper disposition
  • refusing to remand for the entry of an order changing the disposition from denial to dismissal
  • affirming, for the sake of judicial economy, instead of remanding improper denial of habeas corpus petition, where proper disposition was dismissal
  • explaining why \it is proper to dismiss a habeas petition collaterally attacking [a] conviction when it is clearly discernable that the claims raised are procedurally barred or do not comply with the requirements of rule 3.850.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.