Carroll v. SECRETARY, DOC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a failure to hold an evidentiary hearing in a state post-conviction proceeding was not a basis for habeas relief
• holding that a failure to hold an evidentiary hearing in a state post-conviction proceeding was not a basis for habeas relief
• holding that it was not objectively unreasonable to discount low IQ scores in the face of evidence of malingering
• holding that a failure to hold an evidentiary hearing in a state post-conviction proceeding was not a basis for habeas relief
• holding that a failure to hold an evidentiary hearing in a state post-conviction proceeding was not a basis for habeas relief
• holding that a habeas applicant’s claim — the state court violated his due process rights when it summarily denied his post-conviction claim without an evidentiary hearing — did not state a claim on which a federal court may grant habeas relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).