Skip to main content

Griffin v. State

Citations

  • 866 So. 2d 1
  • 2003 WL 22207901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a cumulative error claim must fail where individual claims of error alleged are either procedurally barred or without merit
  • holding that defendant who “has not pointed to any errors that occurred during the portions of the proceedings that were not transcribed” is not entitled to habeas relief
  • holding that defendant who “has not pointed to any errors that occurred during the portions of the proceedings that were not transcribed” is not entitled to habeas relief
  • holding that “mere conclusory allegations” were insufficient in a post-conviction motion
  • explaining that, in closing argument, prosecutor may “review the evidence and ... explicate those inferences which may reasonably be drawn from the evidence”
  • finding that postconviction claim raised for the first time on appeal was procedurally barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.