Supreme Court of Florida· 4/14/2005

Dufour v. State

Citations

905 So. 2d 42
2005 WL 851026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice under Strickland, where additional mitigating evidence “did not substantially differ from that presented during the penalty phase”
holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to put on defense of voluntary intoxication, in part because defense would have been inconsistent with defense's theory of innocence
holding that defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice where additional mitigating evidence did not substantially differ from that presented during the penalty phase
holding that defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice where additional mitigating evidence did not substantially differ from that presented during the penalty phase
finding that claims failed cumulatively where individual claims presented in habeas petition and in motion for postconviction relief provided no basis for relief
concluding that the defendant did not articulate his cumulative error claim in a manner upon which this Court could afford relief where he simply referred to the “sheer number and types of errors involved” in his trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

97 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.