Supreme Court of Florida· 11/14/1991

Jones v. State

Citations

591 So. 2d 911
1991 WL 238600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that to constitute newly discovered evidence under Rule 3.850(b), the evidence “must be of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial” (emphasis omitted)
holding that in order to be entitled to relief under rule 3.850, the defendant must proffer \newly discovered evidence [that is] of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial\
holding that in order to be entitled to relief under rule 3.850, the defendant must proffer “newly discovered evidence [that is] of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial”
holding that untimely or successive rule 3.850 motions must assert why the claim was not known or ascertainable prior to the expiration of the two-year time bar or when the prior rule 3.850 motion was filed
permitting gateway claim of actual innocence based on new evidence in a writ of error coram nobis
establishing standard that newly discovered evidence must be of such a nature that it would probably result in an acquittal on retrial in order to entitle defendant to relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

280 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.