Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 748 So. 2d 1028
  • 1999 WL 1073001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mixed standard of review applies to ineffective assistance of counsel claims
  • recognizing \the trial court's superior vantage point in assessing the credibility of witnesses and in making findings of fact\
  • noting that prejudice is legal conclusion which is accorded no deference
  • “We recognize and honor the trial court’s superior vantage point in assessing the credibility of witnesses and in making findings of fact.”
  • We recognize and honor the trial court’s superior vantage point in assessing the credibility of witnesses and in making findings of fact.”
  • “The second prong of the ineffective assistance of counsel test focuses on the reliability of the proceeding and has never been subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

187 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.