Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 820 So. 2d 199
  • 2002 WL 348205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the prosecutor’s two comments characterizing the defendant as “the devil” were improper, but too isolated to show ineffective, assistance of counsel
  • upholding the trial court’s discretion to deny public records requests that are “overly broad, of questionable relevance, and unlikely to lead to discoverable evidence”
  • habeas claim “could have been raised on direct appeal or in a 3.850 motion and, therefore, it is procedurally barred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.