Supreme Court of Florida· 7/3/2003

Wright v. State

Citations

857 So. 2d 861
2003 WL 21511313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that there was no Brady violation because the exculpatory effect of the disputed documents was merely speculative
holding that the information contained in the police files with regard to other possible suspects was not Brady material
holding that in claims of ineffective assistance based on a conflict of interest the defendant must show that counsel actively represented conflicting interests and that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance
holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance due to the alleged conflict of interest because the defendant failed to demonstrate a conflict as nothing was presented to refute the attorney's testimony that his \loyalty was to his clients\
holding that habeas claims that \the State intentionally deceived this Court\ regarding issues raised on direct appeal could have been presented on direct appeal or in 3.850 proceedings and \cannot be reconsidered in a petition for writ of habeas corpus\
finding no Brady violation where \the exculpatory effect\ of the evidence was \merely speculative\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.