Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 931 So. 2d 790
  • 2006 WL 559361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “vague and conclusory allegations on appeal are insufficient to warrant relief
  • “First, as the circuit court correctly found, the claim was insufficiently pled.”
  • “Smith failed to meet the first prong of the Strickland standard.”
  • “The requirements for establishing a claim based on ineffective assistance of appellate counsel parallel the standards announced in Strickland [v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)]. The ‘[p]etitioner must show 1
  • “[Defendant] has no due process right to require his counsel to aid in the commission of a fraud upon the court by presenting perjurious testimony.” (citing DeHaven v. State, 618 So. 2d 337, 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.