Skip to main content

Freeman v. State

Citations

  • 761 So. 2d 1055
  • 2000 WL 728622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims that could have been raised on direct appeal cannot be relitigated under the guise of ineffective assistance of counsel
  • holding that in a postconviction case the petitioner “bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim”
  • holding that “ineffective assistance of [appellate] counsel cannot be argued where the issue was not preserved for appeal”
  • explaining that ”[t]he defendant bears the bur den of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim” and conclusory allegations are not sufficient
  • noting that the defendant bears “the burden of alleging a specific, serious omission or overt act upon which the ineffective assistance of [appellate] counsel can be based”
  • stating that “[m]ere conclusory allegations are not sufficient” to meet the defendant’s burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

286 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.