Skip to main content

Rutherford v. State

Citations

  • 727 So. 2d 216
  • 1998 WL 904306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that essentially cumulative testimony presented during 3.850 evidentiary hearing was insufficient to establish prejudice in failing to present additional mitigation
  • noting that the trial mental health evaluators were aware of Rutherford's alcoholism and anxiety disorder and merely reached a different conclusion that was not necessarily \inconsistent\ with the postconviction evaluation
  • finding no error in trial court's assessment that \there is no evidence [the defendant's] disorder contributed to his actions in effecting the murder\
  • finding counsel's decision to \humanize\ defendant and not pursue mental health mitigation was a reasonable strategy under the circumstances of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

130 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.