Skip to main content

Wolfe v. State

Citations

  • 917 S.W.2d 270
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
  • 1996 WL 94853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that an intent to steal may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
  • holding that intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
  • explaining that in the absence of custody, due process is violated only by confessions that are not freely given rather than by mere noncompliance with prophylactic rules
  • holding that intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
  • holding that intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
  • holding that intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

257 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.