D.C. Circuit· 7/10/2009

Taylor v. Solis

Citations

571 F.3d 1313
387 U.S. App. D.C. 230
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15319
92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,608
106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1121
2009 WL 2014144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that two-and-a-half month gap between the protected activity and the adverse action did not, on its own, support an inference of retaliation
rejecting interval of two and a half months as establishing temporal proximity “on the record [in this case]”
determining a two-and-a-half-month gap was too long to establish temporal proximity
employer’s criticism of plaintiff for exhibiting “negative behaviors” was not a materially adverse action because petty slights and minor annoyances would not deter a reasonable employee from making a charge of discrimination
two and a half months insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Henderson, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

285 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.