Manuel v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that placement on a performance improvement plan was not an aggravating factor
• noting that the court does not sit as a “super-personnel department” that “independently reevaluates the quality of an employee’s work product” 9 (internal quotations and citation omitted)
• finding that plaintiffs alleged non-receipt of training was not materially adverse
• finding that plaintiff’s alleged non-receipt of training was not materially adverse
• declining to find retaliation where “the plaintiff offer[ed] no evidence outside of his own bald assertion that his supervisors possessed any retaliatory animus toward him”
• “Having determined that the defendant is entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiff’s underlying discrimination and retaliation claims, his constructive discharge claim consequently also fails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).