Skip to main content
· 12/30/2008

Baloch v. Kempthorne

Citations

  • 550 F.3d 1191
  • 384 U.S. App. D.C. 85
  • 21 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 583
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26506
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,427
  • 2008 WL 5396825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that negative performance evaluations constituted materially adverse action when they “resulted in [the plaintiff losing a financial award or an award of leave”
  • holding that employee’s four verbal altercations with supervisor, two impositions of leave restrictions, two proposals of suspension, and other clashes over two-year period were too sporadic
  • concluding that proposed suspensions not actually served were not adverse actions
  • stating that an “essential element[] of a discrimination claim” is that “the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action”
  • analyzing whether the employee suffered an adverse action despite the plaintiff’s failure to rebut the employer’s nondiscriminatory rationale
  • stressing, in the context of an employee’s reassignment, courts’ “hesitancy to engage in ‘judicial micromanagement of business practices’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Kavanaugh, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.