· 7/24/2015
Janet Allen v. Jeh Johnson
Citations
- 417 App. D.C. 297
- 795 F.3d 34
- 417 U.S. App. D.C. 297
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12782
- 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,356
- 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1283
- 2015 WL 4489510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a plaintiff may point to disparate treatment of similarly situated employees to support an inference of pretext
- noting that, on summary judgment, the appropriate inquiry is “whether, on the evidence so viewed, a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party”
- noting that, on summary judgment, appropriate inquiry is “whether, on the evidence so viewed, ‘a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party’”
- noting that, on summary judgment, the appropriate inquiry is “whether, on the evidence so viewed, a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that, on summary judgment, the appropriate inquiry is “whether, on the evidence so viewed, ‘a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party’”
- noting that, on summary judgment, the appropriate inquiry is “whether, on the evidence so viewed, a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmov-ing party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Kavanaugh, Pillard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.