D.C. Circuit· 3/6/2009

Jones v. Bernanke

Citations

557 F.3d 670
384 U.S. App. D.C. 443
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539
92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,489
105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1241
2009 WL 564611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that courts may review prima facie evidence toward ultimate issue of retaliation vel non
holding that courts may review prima facie evidence toward ultimate issue of retaliation vel non
holding that plaintiff engaged in statutorily protected activity, suffered a materially adverse action by his employer, and that a causal link connects the two
holding that an amended complaint‘s discrimination claims did not relate back because the original complaint ―sets forth no facts that would support them‖
recognizing that this evidence tends to support circumstantial evidence of retaliation at the prima facie stage, and that it \applies to the ultimate inquiry as well\
recognizing that this evidence tends to support circumstantial evidence of retaliation at the prima facie stage, and that it “applies to the ultimate inquiry as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Tatel, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

644 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jones v. Bernanke

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.