Jones v. Bernanke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts may review prima facie evidence toward ultimate issue of retaliation vel non
• holding that courts may review prima facie evidence toward ultimate issue of retaliation vel non
• holding that plaintiff engaged in statutorily protected activity, suffered a materially adverse action by his employer, and that a causal link connects the two
• holding that an amended complaint‘s discrimination claims did not relate back because the original complaint ―sets forth no facts that would support them‖
• recognizing that this evidence tends to support circumstantial evidence of retaliation at the prima facie stage, and that it \applies to the ultimate inquiry as well\
• recognizing that this evidence tends to support circumstantial evidence of retaliation at the prima facie stage, and that it “applies to the ultimate inquiry as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).