District of Columbia· 5/20/2011
Glass v. LaHood
Citations
- 786 F. Supp. 2d 189
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54035
- 2011 WL 1930669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- choice of whether to permit filing of supplemental briefing turns on whether briefing “would be helpful to the resolution of the pending motion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bigwood v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-25· cited 83×
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-28· cited 65×
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-26· cited 42×
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-20· cited 35×
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District of Columbia· 2017-03-30· cited 18×
- Kilby-Robb v. DuncanDistrict of Columbia· 2015-01-08· cited 16×
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 13×
- Hardy Exploration & Prod. (India), Inc. v. Gov't of IndiaD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-07· cited 13×
- Rowe v. JewellE.D. Louisiana· 2015-02-13· cited 12×
- Gates v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-29· cited 11×
- Bayala v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-30· cited 9×
- Kilby-Robb v. DeVosDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-30· cited 9×
- Perry v. ClintonDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-30· cited 8×
- Khine v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-24· cited 8×
- Chambers v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-12-31· cited 7×
- Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-21· cited 7×
- Bruder v. MonizDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-02· cited 6×
- United States of America Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter OneDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-31· cited 5×
- Beck v. NavyFederal Circuit· 2021-05-14· cited 5×
- Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-04-06· cited 4×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court· 2009-06-29· cited 1,988×
- United States v. James C. DunkelSeventh Circuit· 1991-03-08· cited 1,563×
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2006-01-10· cited 1,529×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Baloch v. KempthorneD.C. Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 1,027×
- Jones v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 725×
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-13· cited 605×
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 590×
- Ronald J. Fischbach v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections and Hallem H. Williams, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1996-07-15· cited 586×
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court· 2008-02-26· cited 584×
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 558×
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsD.C. Circuit· 1981-01-12· cited 489×
- Steele v. SchaferD.C. Circuit· 2008-08-01· cited 412×
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2002-09-25· cited 401×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.