Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a time lapse of nine months between the filing of a formal grievance and the adverse employment action undercut any inference of causation
• holding that a plaintiff who fails to establish a claim of discrimination may still assert a retaliation claim under the ADEA or the ADA
• holding that a plaintiff who fails to establish a claim of discrimination may still assert a retaliation claim under the ADA and ADEA
• holding that a nine-month period between the protected conduct and alleged retaliation undermined the inference of causation
• holding that, for summary judgment purposes, factual disputes must be resolved in favor of the nonmovant
• holding that a time lapse of nine months between the filing of a formal grievance and the adverse employment action undercut any inference of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).