D.C. Circuit· 7/7/2015
Rhonda Baird v. Joshua Gotbaum
Citations
- 416 U.S. App. D.C. 505
- 792 F.3d 166
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11620
- 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 961
- 2015 WL 4079546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding dismissal of complaints for failure to state a claim of retaliatory hostile work environment rather than on the grounds of issue preclusion and untimeliness that the trial court relied on; quotation marks omitted
- “The constituent acts must be adequately linked such that they form a coherent hostile environment claim.” (cleaned up)
- “occasional name-calling, rude emails, lost tempers and workplace disagreements [constitute] the kind of conduct courts frequently deem uncognizable under Title VII”
- “[A]s an appellate court, we can ‘affirm the District Court on any valid ground, and need not follow the same mode of analysis.’” (citation omitted)
- “[I]f certain conduct would not dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination, neither would an employer’s failure to investigate that conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Williams, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Komis v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of LaborThird Circuit· 2019-03-12· cited 110×
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2017-02-21· cited 69×
- Elzeneiny v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-19· cited 64×
- Cassandra Menoken v. Janet DhillonD.C. Circuit· 2020-09-15· cited 57×
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-10-09· cited 37×
- Aldrich v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-18· cited 34×
- Menoken v. McGettiganDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-11· cited 34×
- Junius Joyner, III v. Morrison and Foerster LLPD.C. Circuit· 2025-06-20· cited 29×
- Saunders v. MillsDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-24· cited 24×
- Richardson v. YellenDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-08· cited 22×
- Magowan v. LoweryDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-29· cited 21×
- Smith v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-15· cited 20×
- Process and Industrial Developments Limited v. Federal Republic of NigeriaD.C. Circuit· 2022-03-11· cited 19×
- Leach v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-03· cited 18×
- Hudson v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.D.C. Circuit· 2018-04-10· cited 18×
- Toomer v. PanettaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-19· cited 15×
- David Rudometkin v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2025-06-10· cited 15×
- Chien v. SullivanD.C. Circuit· 2018-04-25· cited 14×
- Gray v. FoxxD.C. Circuit· 2015-12-18· cited 14×
- United States House of Representatives v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-09· cited 13×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Baloch v. KempthorneD.C. Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 1,027×
- Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2002-10-18· cited 452×
- Taylor v. SolisD.C. Circuit· 2009-07-10· cited 318×
- Baird v. GotbaumD.C. Circuit· 2011-12-13· cited 308×
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyD.C. Circuit· 1988-04-26· cited 258×
- Hussain, Mohammed v. Nicholson, R. JamesD.C. Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 224×
- Stephanie Brown v. Allen SessomsD.C. Circuit· 2014-12-19· cited 196×
- Patricia Brooks v. Susan GrundmannD.C. Circuit· 2014-04-15· cited 122×
- Daniel Molerio v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationD.C. Circuit· 1984-11-30· cited 116×
- Kevin Hairston v. Davita Vance-CooksD.C. Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 97×
- Anthony Zerilli and Michael Polizzi v. The Evening News AssociationD.C. Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 64×
- Baird v. SnowbargerDistrict of Columbia· 2010-10-13· cited 32×
- Baird v. SnowbargerDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.