Rhonda Baird v. Joshua Gotbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding dismissal of complaints for failure to state a claim of retaliatory hostile work environment rather than on the grounds of issue preclusion and untimeliness that the trial court relied on; quotation marks omitted
• “The constituent acts must be adequately linked such that they form a coherent hostile environment claim.” (cleaned up)
• “occasional name-calling, rude emails, lost tempers and workplace disagreements [constitute] the kind of conduct courts frequently deem uncognizable under Title VII”
• “[A]s an appellate court, we can ‘affirm the District Court on any valid ground, and need not follow the same mode of analysis.’” (citation omitted)
• “[I]f certain conduct would not dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination, neither would an employer’s failure to investigate that conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).