D.C. Circuit· 1/17/2012

Gary Hamilton v. Timothy Geithner

Citations

399 U.S. App. D.C. 77
666 F.3d 1344
2012 WL 119134
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 911
95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,400
114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a two-month gap between the employee’s protected activity and the employer’s adverse, action was sufficiently brief to support an inference of retaliation
holding that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies where his “formal EEO complaint ma[de] no mention” of the challenged action.
recognizing that inconsistent application of criteria or post hoc rationales may be indicative of pretext
holding that an absence of contemporaneous documentation of the defendant's proffered explanation, \could lead a reasonable jury to doubt the [defendant's] explanation\
holding that missing documentation of an interviewing panel’s deliberations, coupled with a missing page of interview notes, could lead a reasonable jury to doubt the employer’s interview-based explanation
holding that a complainant “cannot rely on the EEO counseling report to establish exhaustion of a claim that he failed to include in his formal complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Garland, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

410 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.