State v. Webb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “bare assertions” about knowledge potentially held by undeposed witnesses did not “demonstrate prejudice to a substantial right”
• “bare assertions” about knowledge potentially held by undeposed witnesses did not “demonstrate prejudice to a substantial right”
• breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny involves dishonesty
• breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny involves dishonesty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).