Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 6/24/2003

State v. Webb

Citations

130 S.W.3d 799
2003 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 567
2003 WL 21488010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that T.C.A. § 39-14-202(a)(2) was not unconstitutionally vague based -19- upon its use of the word “necessary”
holding that a humane society that cared for animals seized from a defendant who committed animal cruelty is a victim because statute obligates state-sponsored shelters to care for such animals
holding that a humane society that cared for animals seized from a defendant who committed animal cruelty is a victim because statute obligates state-sponsored shelters to care for such animals
concluding that the humane society who cared for animals seized from a defendant who committed animal cruelty is a victim because statute obligates state- sponsored shelters to care for such animals
involving forfeiture by the criminal court after the defendant was convicted of forty-seven counts of animal cruelty
analyzing Tennessee’s animal cruelty statute in the context of a vagueness challenge and examining statutes from other jurisdictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Alan E. Glenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.