Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/7/1999

State v. Harris

Citations

589 N.W.2d 782
1999 Minn. LEXIS 1
1999 WL 6533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that one factor that an issuing judge may consider in making the probable-cause determination is a reasonable inference as to where a suspect would normally keep the type of items sought
noting that the factors the issuing judge may 9 consider include the type of crime and the nature of the items sought
stating that “the resolution of doubtful or marginal cases should be ‘largely determined by the preference to be accorded warrants’ ” (quoting Wiley, 366 N.W.2d at 268)
stating that for purposes of issuing a search warrant, “[cjommon sense permits an inference” that documents showing that a suspect resided in a certain place would normally be found in a person’s home
stating that “probable cause to search exists [if] . . . there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
stating that certain allegations in a warrant affidavit lacked context to establish their relevance, raising “a genuine concern” that they were “stale or simply irrelevant,” but that other factual allegations were sufficient to establish probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul H. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.