Skip to main content

State v. Webb

Citations

  • 648 N.W.2d 72
  • 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 142
  • 2002 WL 1558439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing possession is a necessary component of a drug tax stamp charge, and inferences of constructive possession must be drawn from facts that “have a ‘visible, plain, or necessary connection’ with” such possession (citation omitted)
  • stating a defendant's incriminating actions when drugs are discovered support a finding that defendant had right to exercise control over drugs
  • stating a defendant’s incriminating actions when drugs are discovered support a finding that defendant had right to exercise control over drugs
  • overturning possession conviction and noting none of the prohibited “items [were] found near or among Webb’s personal belongings”
  • overturning possession conviction and noting none of the prohibited “items [were] found near or among Webb’s personal belongings”
  • finding no possession when none of the items were “items found near or among Webb’s personal belongings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.