Supreme Court of Minnesota· 9/1/1995

State v. Ford

Citations

539 N.W.2d 214
1995 Minn. LEXIS 704
1995 WL 517326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court properly allowed the application of the doctrine of transferred intent in an attempted-murder case
holding it was error to admit statements that were non-self-incul-patory but contained within a largely self-inculpatory narrative
considering that under case law in effect at the time of the alleged violation, the prosecutor could have believed he had complied with Rule 4.2
stating that the discretionary determination of whether multiple sentences should run concurrently or consecutively may not be delegated to the Department of Corrections
stating that plea agreements, later withdrawn, or any statements made in connection therewith, are inadmissible in any criminal or civil proceeding, whether offered for or against the person who made the plea or offer
noting that Lefthand was advised of and waived his constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tomljanovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.