Skip to main content

State v. Henderson

Citations

  • 620 N.W.2d 688
  • 2001 Minn. LEXIS 7
  • 2001 WL 25898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen a defendant alleges that his inability to present a defense violates his constitutional rights, evidentiary questions are (Footnote continued from previous page.) standard of proof imposed on the State in criminal trials
  • “As there is no indication the prosecutor persisted in trying to elicit testimony the court had ruled inadmissible, the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that there was no prosecutorial misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lancaster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.