Skip to main content

State v. Bowles

Citations

  • 530 N.W.2d 521
  • 1995 Minn. LEXIS 313
  • 1995 WL 232748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that juror misconduct may undermine the rights of a criminal defendant to a fair trial and an impartial jury, thereby warranting a new trial
  • holding a recantation was not likely to produce a result more favorable to the petitioner because the remaining witnesses had not recanted
  • corroborating evidence of accomplice testimony is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict
  • remanding for supplementation of the record where the record did not reveal facts essential to appellate review
  • allowing the defendant to expose potential biases of a witness on cross-examination where that witness received “benefits” in the form of witness protection and leniency in other criminal cases
  • stating that circumstantial evidence can corroborate accomplice testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.