Skip to main content

State v. Webb

Citations

  • 980 S.W.2d 924
  • 1998 WL 772654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court of appeals addressed State's cross-appeal concerning trial judge's ruling on enhancement allegations because double jeopardy would not preclude State from seeking a more severe penalty on remand, but rejected cross-appeal on the merits
  • court of appeals addressed State’s cross-appeal concerning trial judge’s ruling on enhancement allegations because double jeopardy would not preclude State from seeking a more severe penalty on remand, but rejected cross-appeal on the merits
  • court of appeals addressed State’s cross-appeal concerning trial judge’s ruling on enhancement allegations because double jeopardy would not preclude State from seeking a more severe penalty on remand, but rejected cross-appeal on the merits
  • court of appeals addressed State's cross-appeal concerning trial judge's ruling on enhancement allegations because double jeopardy would not preclude State from seeking a more severe penalty on remand, but rejected cross-appeal on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.