Supreme Court of Minnesota· 12/8/2005

State v. Pendleton

Citations

706 N.W.2d 500
2005 Minn. LEXIS 763
2005 WL 3312557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a prosecutor’s improper question was harmless because a curative instruction was given and the fairness of the trial was not impaired
holding that a prosecutor's improper question was harmless because a curative instruction was given and the fairness of the trial was not impaired
holding that prosecutor’s improper reference to out-of-court statement during cross-examination was “[p]rosecutorial error”
holding that a prosecutor’s improper question was harmless because a curative instruction was given and the fairness of the trial was not impaired
holding that prosecutorial misconduct may be cured by district court instruction
holding that prosecutorial misconduct may be cured by district court instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.